On February 25, a meeting was held in Jalal-Abad to discuss the results of the regional court's work over the past year. The event was attended by the Chairman of the Supreme Court of Kyrgyzstan, Mederbek Satiev.
Among the participants were judges of the Supreme Court, including Bolotbek Akmatov, Dilaru Arstanbaeva, Nurgul Asanova, Sulaymankula Atakulov, Tynibek Bekeshov, as well as the advisor to the chairman Ruslan Myrzalimov, the director of the Judicial Department Bakyt Kurmanaliev, and the director of the Higher School of Justice Erkinbek Toktomambetov. The chairman of the Jalal-Abad regional court, Zhipar Sabirova, and judges of local courts were also present.
In his report, Mederbek Satiev emphasized the positive results of the work of the courts in the Jalal-Abad region for 2025. He noted the increase in the number of cases considered and the rise in the percentage of upheld court decisions.
Particularly noticeable progress was demonstrated in the Jalal-Abad regional court, as well as in the courts of Nooken, Ala-Buka, Aksy, Manas, Tash-Kumyr, and Kara-Kul. Some judges showed high results with a rate of upheld court acts ranging from 90 to 100 percent.
In light of the achieved successes and the high level of decision affirmation, the chairman thanked the heads of the Aksy district court, the Administrative Court of the Jalal-Abad region, and the Toguz-Toro district court.
However, in a number of district courts, such as Suzak, Chatkal, and Mailuu-Suu, there was a decrease in the percentage of upheld court acts, with some judges showing rates of 40-60%. This indicates the need for additional measures to improve the quality of justice and ensure uniform judicial practice. The chairman issued instructions to strengthen work in this area.
The analysis of cases showed that among criminal offenses, property crimes (thefts, fraud), evasion of child support, and drug-related crimes predominated. In civil proceedings, the largest number of cases concerned divorces, debt collection, alimony, and inheritance disputes. In administrative cases, the majority consisted of complaints against acts of state bodies regarding land issues.
Nevertheless, the chairman noted that the work on summarizing judicial practice in some courts was insufficient. In most cases, summaries were limited to statistical data and did not comply with methodological recommendations. Summarizing and studying practice is a key tool for improving the quality of justice, and the conclusions should be practically applicable and discussed with judges.
The meeting also discussed information on measures to expedite the online broadcasting of court sessions, the implementation of automated case distribution, and the installation of audio and video recording systems in courtrooms.
Citizens' appeals indicate the need to raise the professional level of staff, adopt a more polite and open approach to visitors, adhere to procedural deadlines, and strengthen organizational discipline. Instances of delays in the start of hearings, delays in issuing court acts, and inappropriate behavior by some employees were noted. Proposals were also made for the development of electronic document management, conducting online hearings, and improving the information support of courts.
Mederbek Satiev instructed to take additional measures to enhance the quality of justice, ensure the timely consideration of cases, and foster a respectful and open attitude towards citizens.
