Mowed clover in someone else's fields and threatened with a knife. A man was convicted in the Chui region.

Сергей Гармаш Incidents
VK X OK WhatsApp Telegram
In the Sokuluk district of the Chui region, a man faced criminal prosecution for the illegal mowing of clover on rented lands, accompanied by threats directed at the tenants. This information was published on the "Digital Justice" portal.

Names have been changed.

Erkin, convicted of self-will, was aware that these plots were rented and had legal owners. Nevertheless, in June 2023, threatening a tenant named Musa, he illegally mowed clover, collecting a thousand bales.

After that, he mowed clover again, making another 400 bales, which he sold, causing damage to Musa amounting to 560,000 soms.

When Erkin returned to the field with threats, Musa contacted the police, which prevented Erkin from taking the mowed clover. However, later, with a knife in hand, Erkin cut the strings on 1,080 bales of hay belonging to Musa, causing damage amounting to 47,000 soms.

Additionally, knowing that the plot belonged to Alan, Erkin also mowed clover that same month, making 220 bales under the threat of physical violence. He repeated this action, making 300 bales and taking them, resulting in damage of 208,000 soms.

Returning to the field with a knife, Erkin again threatened Alan and cut the strings on 220 bales, causing damage of 11,500 soms.

Erkin's lawyer filed a cassation appeal requesting the annulment of the verdicts of the two instances and the acquittal of his client, claiming that the charges were not substantiated during the trial. He pointed out the superficial approach of the courts and the lack of proper assessment of the defense's arguments. The lawyer also noted that there was no actual violence or threats from Erkin, and no damage was caused to the land plots.

The appeal mentions that the victim Alan claimed he had rented his land to the LLC "Ch." for a long time and had no conflicts with Erkin, which casts doubt on the legality of Erkin's actions. However, representatives of LLC "Ch." were not questioned in court.

The judicial panel of the Supreme Court, having considered the arguments of the cassation appeal and examined the case materials, decided to leave the verdicts unchanged and rejected the lawyer's appeal.

The photo on the main page is illustrative: olx.kz.
VK X OK WhatsApp Telegram

Read also: