A study published in the journal Frontiers of Psychology is based on the concept of universal biological consciousness. According to this theory, consciousness has been transmitted through billions of years of cell division from a common ancestor—the very first cellular organism. All living beings, including humans, inherit this ancient biological trait. Therefore, consciousness does not arise suddenly, but is passed down through generations from preceding life forms.
The theory of "absolute biological consciousness" challenges commonly accepted views, asserting that consciousness was originally present and governed evolutionary processes, as reported by Daily Neuron. The internal awareness of an organism, according to the authors, influences its genetic and physical changes, rather than the other way around. Thus, function precedes structure.
As a result, the researcher suggests rethinking the well-known statement by Descartes, "I think, therefore I am." In her view, "think" implies not just an internal dialogue, but the very capacity for consciousness. Verbal thought serves merely as a tool for communication, not as the source of consciousness.
This theory may have significant implications for the field of artificial intelligence. If consciousness is an exclusively biological trait rooted in ancient times, then creating truly conscious AI becomes highly questionable. Although AI systems can process data and model communication, they lack subjective internal experience—qualia.
Moreover, new ideas may open new horizons in medicine. Diseases such as cancer can be viewed as a failure in cellular bioscience, which could lead to the development of new therapeutic approaches.
Finally, this concept shifts the focus in discussions about AI ethics and safety. It allows us to view artificial intelligence as a powerful but non-conscious tool, shifting the emphasis to responsible approaches to control and the ethical use of technologies that cannot truly be alive.
